Why It Matters
Head office often can’t see store conditions. A 2015 report by POPAI UK and Ireland, the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland arm of Point of Purchase Advertising International (POPAI), found that 79% of retailers assume displays are executed rather than checking, and that when campaigns are audited at all, it’s often only about 20% of stores, usually the highest-turnover ones, or a periodic check every three to six months.1 The same report found full compliance for in-store campaigns can be as low as 29%.1 What isn’t seen is usually worse than people believe. System data isn’t a safe substitute for eyes on the shelf. In a study published in California Management Review, 65% of inventory records at one leading retailer were inaccurate, and execution problems like this can cut a retailer’s profits by more than 10%.2 A photo taken during the visit shows what was actually on the shelf that day.Best Practice
Set a Photo Standard
Write a short standard and train every rep on it. A good default for shelf and display photos:- Square on. Stand facing the bay, not at an angle down the aisle.
- The right distance. Get the whole bay or display in frame, top shelf to bottom. For a wide bay, take overlapping shots rather than one blurry wide one.
- Good light, no glare. Tilt the phone to avoid reflections from shelf lights, chiller doors, and the flash.
- Nothing in the way. Wait for shoppers and trolleys to move.
- One subject per photo. One display, one bay, or one price ticket. Make sure the price ticket and point-of-sale (POS) material are readable when the question is about them.
- Before and after. When a rep fixes something, a photo before and a photo after shows the work, not only the result.
Decide When a Photo Is Required
Photos take time in store and storage in Salesforce, so require them where they prove something. Good candidates:- Promotion and display compliance questions.
- Planogram or share of shelf checks.
- Any fix the rep made, such as a rebuilt display or a pack-out.
- Problems you want the store or head office to act on, such as damaged stock or a missing price ticket.
Review Photos, and Tell Reps What You See
A photo nobody looks at doesn’t change behavior. Managers should review a sample each week, compare each photo to the answer beside it, and give the rep feedback: what was good, and what to retake next time. A “yes” answer with a photo of an empty shelf is a coaching conversation.Audit a Sample
You can’t review every photo. Combine full-coverage rep photos with manager spot checks on a sample of stores. Rotate the sample, and include smaller stores, so the check isn’t only on the stores everyone already watches. Ride-alongs are a good time to check that photos match what’s in the store.Protect the Evidence
Photos are only proof if they were taken at that store on that visit. Check that photos carry the date and the record they belong to, and that the rep checked in at the store. In the app’s Photos gallery, each photo’s details show its size, record, date, and location. Ask reps to sync photos the same day, so evidence reaches you while you can still act on it.How FieldKo Helps
Smart Camera checks a photo’s quality on the device: Lighting, Clarity, Completeness, and Stability. It tells the rep whether the photo is usable. A manager still judges what the photo shows. Smart Camera is used for survey photos; photos on visits, accounts, and pack-outs use the normal camera.
Checklist
- A written photo standard that every rep has seen.
- Required photos only on questions where they prove something.
- Every photo attached to the question it supports.
- A weekly review of a rotating sample, with feedback to reps.
- Photos synced the same day as the visit.
See Also
- Execute Promotions and Displays
- Win the Shelf
- Coach Your Field Team
- Take Photos with Smart Camera
- Export FieldKo Data and Photos
Sources
- POPAI UK and Ireland, “In-Store Insights, Issue 24: Compliance Report,” 2015. Read the report
- Raman, DeHoratius, and Ton, “Execution: The Missing Link in Retail Operations,” California Management Review, 2001. Read the article