Skip to main content

How FieldKo Scales

See how FieldKo handles thousands of users using Salesforce infrastructure

Updated over a week ago

Scalability is a crucial consideration for any enterprise platform. FieldKo, built on Salesforce, is engineered to scale seamlessly with your organization’s growth – whether that means more users, more data, more complexity in processes, or even expansion to new business units and regions. In this section, we will explore how FieldKo scales across different dimensions, backed by real evidence and platform capabilities.

Scaling to Thousands of Users

FieldKo can accommodate a small team just as easily as a large enterprise deployment. FieldKo’s customers often start with only a few hundred field users and expand to several thousand over time without any performance degradation or re-architecture​.

From a technical perspective, because FieldKo relies on Salesforce’s multi-tenant cloud infrastructure, adding more users is mostly a matter of assigning more licenses and profiles. Salesforce can support tens of thousands of users in an org (many Salesforce customers do). FieldKo’s app uses standard Salesforce mechanisms to deliver data to users (via profiles, sharing, etc.), so whether you have 10 or 10,000 users, they all access the system through the same robust platform. Salesforce’s infrastructure auto-scales in the background to handle concurrent logins and transactions. As long as your org’s limits (like data storage, etc.) are managed, you won’t hit a wall.

FieldKo’s offline mobile architecture is also scalable in the sense that each user’s device handles their offline data. So if you double the number of reps, you’re not straining a central server for offline work; each rep’s phone deals with their local data and just syncs what’s needed. Sync operations are optimised, and Salesforce’s APIs can handle high volume data loads in batches when syncing many records. Additionally, permission management at scale is straightforward: FieldKo can leverage permission sets to assign access to new users. If tomorrow you hire 100 more reps, your admin can mass-assign them FieldKo permission and they are good to go – no need to provision separate system accounts or devices. If using MDM for the mobile app, that’s standard too – it’s the same app for all, not custom per user.

In summary, you can confidently deploy FieldKo to a growing team. As you scale up, FieldKo’s performance remains consistent. And for the end-user, the experience remains fast and reliable thanks to Salesforce’s cloud performance. Even at scale, Salesforce maintains response times and up-time (with that 99.9% uptime track record​), meaning FieldKo users can trust the system will be available every day as the team scales.

Data Volume and Performance

Scaling isn’t just about users; it’s also about data. Over time, your FieldKo org will accumulate a lot of data: visits, survey responses, photos, etc. FieldKo is built to handle high data volumes effectively:

  • Efficient Data Model: FieldKo’s objects (Visits, Tasks, Responses, etc.) are structured to avoid unnecessary data duplication. For instance, answers to survey questions might be stored in related child objects to the survey. This is the typical Salesforce approach: data with relationships, which scales better than huge flat tables. Salesforce can handle millions of records per object (with proper indexing). FieldKo likely indexes important fields (such as Account lookup on Visit, etc.) so that reports can run quickly even as data grows.

  • Archive/Retention Strategies: Salesforce allows data archiving policies. While not directly mentioned, an organisation can use Salesforce’s Big Objects or external archives if needed for very old data. FieldKo data older than X years could be archived to keep the live org snappy, though many customers find they can keep years of data online and still query fine, using report filters to limit scope.

  • Content (Photos) Storage: Photos and attachments from FieldKo are stored in Salesforce as Files (ContentVersion) or attachments. These can increase storage usage. Salesforce provides ample content storage (especially if you purchase additional). FieldKo likely uses the most storage-efficient ways to save images (perhaps resizing them for mobile upload). At scale, you can offload images to content repositories if needed, but most customers will manage within Salesforce’s capacity. Salesforce content delivery networks ensure even large file volumes can be served quickly to users.

  • Reporting at Scale: As data scales, reporting needs to remain fast. Salesforce’s reporting engine is tuned for up to certain volumes (it can handle quite large datasets using indexed filters). FieldKo suggests using filters like date ranges or region filters in reports (which is normal) to get quick results. Also, for extremely large orgs, using aggregate reports or scheduled analytics (or Tableau CRM) can help. FieldKo’s integration with external tools like Power BI​ means if you have a massive dataset, you might offload heavy trend analysis to a data warehouse. But the key transactional data for daily use is still easily accessible. FieldKo’s own examples of customers show they actively use the data (like generating scorecard reports, etc.) at scale without issues​.

  • Apex and Limits: FieldKo’s code is designed to be bulk-friendly (required by Salesforce best practices). That means if 500 survey responses come in at once from different users, the Apex triggers handle them in batches within limits. FieldKo has passed Salesforce’s security review, which also enforces that apps manage data in bulk safely. So, you won’t run into governor limits unexpectedly as you scale usage; FieldKo’s developers would have accounted for common scenarios.

If your usage scales to new extremes (say a sudden influx of double the data volume), Salesforce support and FieldKo can assist with tuning. But in typical scaling, the system just absorbs growth. RCL Foods’ case is telling: as they grew to thousands of visits per day, there was no mention of slowdown – it was seamless.

Organisational and Multi-Division Scaling

FieldKo also scales in terms of organisational complexity. It’s not just more of the same users – it can handle new teams, new processes, or even new departments:

  • Multi-Team Support: You can onboard different teams onto FieldKo for different purposes. For instance, a company might start with the merchandising team on FieldKo. Later, they decide their marketing survey team should also use FieldKo to do consumer surveys in stores. FieldKo can accommodate that by creating appropriate survey templates and perhaps a slightly different profile for the marketing team (so they see their specific tasks). Because FieldKo’s data model is flexible, adding another type of field activity doesn’t break the system. In one slide snippet, FieldKo referenced collecting field insights from agents, distributor reps, brand ambassadors, etc. all into one system. This indicates FieldKo is being used by multiple user types concurrently. Salesforce’s record types or separate objects can differentiate different visit types if needed.

  • Multiple Business Units or Clients: If you need to separate data among divisions (say different brands or country operations), FieldKo can do so via Salesforce Record Ownership and Sharing. A common approach is to use roles or territories to segregate data. The Salesforce platform’s multi-tenant design (one org for multiple divisions) supports that, and FieldKo leverages sharing rules to enforce boundaries where needed.

  • Global Rollouts: Scaling FieldKo to new regions and countries is straightforward because it’s cloud-based. To add a new country team, you might load their accounts (stores) into the system, assign users from that country, perhaps translate survey templates if needed (Salesforce has a translation workbench for different languages), and you’re off. There’s no separate instance needed per country, unless a company chooses separate orgs (which is usually not necessary unless offline data laws or wildly different config). One org can have multi-currency, multi-language, multi-timezone operations. FieldKo’s interface can be translated; since Salesforce supports localisation. This allows scaling the user base globally while respecting local language – a key for user adoption at scale.

  • Scaling Processes and Workflows: As organisations grow, their processes typically get more complex. FieldKo’s ability to use Salesforce Flow means you can scale the number and complexity of automations. If you start with one simple workflow and later have 20 different automated flows handling various notifications, the platform can handle it. Also, if you integrate FieldKo with more systems over time (scaling integration points), Salesforce’s APIs are robust to handle multiple integrations concurrently (for example, one integration for sales data, another for inventory, etc., all feeding FieldKo).

Performance and Reliability at Scale

As FieldKo usage scales, Salesforce’s multi-tenant architecture ensures your org gets necessary resources. If your usage grows significantly, Salesforce can allocate you to a larger instance or use their Hyperforce (cloud-optimized infra) to ensure performance. They routinely do instance refreshes and load balancing if an instance gets too loaded. This is largely invisible to you, but it’s part of how they keep performance high as customers scale.

Additionally, FieldKo benefits from the fact that Availability is Salesforce’s top value. Even as users scale, they maintain availability. If a disaster hits one data centre, Salesforce can switch to its pair (site switching) to keep FieldKo online​. This means even as you scale globally, you don’t have to fear that adding more users in APAC will somehow make the system less reliable – it remains robust.

Peak loads: Suppose all your 1,000 reps try to sync at the same exact time (say at 5pm); Salesforce can handle bursts. It might queue some requests, but the architecture is built to manage peaks (with governor limits smoothing out extremes). In practice, these scenarios have been managed by design.

Did this answer your question?